Effect of Bulb Cutting and Pot Medium on Propagation of Hippeastrum (Hippeastrum hybridum Hort.)

Authors

1 Senior Scientific Officer, Biotechnology Division, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Gazipur, Bangladesh

2 Professor, Department of Horticulture, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University (BSMRAU), Gazipur, Bangladesh

3 Senior Scientific Officer, Horticulture Research Center, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Gazipur, Bangladesh

Abstract

Experiments were conducted at the Horticulture Research Farm of Horticulture Department, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University (BSMRAU), Salna, Gazipur during December, 2007 to May, 2009 to investigate the effect of bulb cutting and potting media on propagation of hippeastrum. The bulb cutting significantly influenced all the parameters
except days required to first leaf emergence and leaf breadth at 60 DAP. Leaf number at 60 DAP, leaf length at 60 and 100 DAP, number of plant per section of bulb and number of bulb per pot were found to be significantly increased upto second treatment and then gradually decreased with the increase of bulb cutting. The highest number (2.20) of plant per section of bulb, bulblets (2.20) per section of bulb were obtained from 4 sections/bulb while diameter (20.74 mm) of bulb and combined weight (57.65 g) of bulb and plant were maximum at treatment 2 sections/bulb. Potting media also showed significant influence on all studied parameters. The maximum number (2.04) of plant per section of bulb and bulblets (2.04) per section of bulb were revealed at potting media containing only compost while the potting media
contained sand, soil and compost at equal amount produced the biggest size of bulblets (20.07 mm) and maximum weight (44.75 g) of bulb and plant combinedly. However, the combined effect of T2 x P3 produced the maximum number (2.60) of plant and bulblets per section of bulb while the biggest size (23.05 mm) of bulblets and the highest yield (68.66 g) of bulb and plants were obtained in T1 x P4.

Keywords


1. Dohare, S.R. 1989. Amaryllis and Hippeastrum. In: Commercial Flowers. T.K. Bose, R.G. Maiti and R.S. Dhva, (eds.), Naya Prokash, Calcutta. pp. 558-564.
 
2. Ephrath, J.E., Ben-Asher, J., Baruchin, F., Alekperov, C., Dayan, E. and Silberbush, M. 2001. Various cutting methods for the propagation of hippeastrum bulbs. Biotronics. 30: 75-83.
 
3. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez. A.A. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural Research (2nd edition). Int. Rice Res. Inst. John Wiley and Sons Publication, New York. pp. 28-192.
 
4. Gromov, A.N. 1972. Propagation by division. In: The world of gladiolus, Edge. Wood Press, Maryland. pp. 98-102.
 
5. Heaton, I. W. 1934. Vegetative propagation of Amaryllis. Herbertia, 1: 75-82.
 
6. Misra, R.L. 1994. Propagatiion of gladiolus through sprouts- An entirely new method in gladiolus propagation. In: Floriculture Technology, Trades and Trends. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi. pp. 67-70.
 
7. Misra, R.L. 1995. Studies on gladiolus propagation through fractionated corms. Haryanan Journal of Horticultural Science. 24(3-4): 203-208.
 
8. Rees, A.R. 1985. Hippeastrum. In: Handbook of flowering. A.H. Halevy (ed.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. pp. 294-296.
 
9. Singh, K.P. 1996. Response of whole and excised corms on production of spikes in gladiolus. Indian Journal of Horticulture. 53(3): 228-232.
 
10. Smith, R.H., Burrows, J. and Kurten, K. 1999. Challenges associated with micropropagation of Zephyranthes and Hippeastrum sp. (Amaryllidaceae). In vitro Cellular and Development of Biology Plant. 35(4): 281-282. [DOI via Crossref]   
 
11. Witomska, M., Ilczuk, A. and Zalewska, I. 2005. Effect of cutting size on propagation efficiency of Hippeastrum x Chmielii by scale cuttings. Propagation of Ornamental Plants. 5(4): 205-209.
 
12. Zhu, Y., Liu, K.S. and Yiu, J.C. 2005. Effect of cutting method on bulb production of Hippeastrum hybridum in Taiwan. Acta-Horticulturae. 2: 531-535.